For years, European manufacturers focused on producing at the lowest possible cost. This often meant working with suppliers and factories far from home but supply-chain disruptions, rising logistics costs and geopolitical uncertainty have changed the way companies think about manufacturing.
Nearshoring means moving production or sourcing closer to the market where products are sold. For European manufacturers, this can mean working with suppliers in Europe or North Africa.
But what opportunities does nearshoring create? And can it help European manufacturers become more resilient, flexible, and competitive ?
80% European supply chains are under pressure
Between 2021 and 2023, 80% of EU enterprises experienced at least one global value-chain constraint or reorganisation. Supply-chain resilience is becoming a strategic priority for European businesses.
29% Regional sourcing is gaining ground
29% of EU enterprises affected by global value-chain constraints reported finding new suppliers or buyers within the EU as a response. Regional sourcing is becoming part of the resilience toolkit.
56% Nearshoring is moving up the agenda
In Capgemini’s 2025 global manufacturing survey, 56% of executives said their organisations had invested in nearshoring or a combination of reshoring and nearshoring over the previous year.
Why European manufacturers are reconsidering their supply chains
The manufacturing supply chain is no longer judged only by its efficiency on a normal day, its ability to keep working when conditions change matters just as much.
Supply-chain disruption has changed the calculation
A global supply chain can be highly efficient and still be surprisingly fragile.
When a manufacturer depends on a limited number of overseas suppliers, a disruption in one location can affect several parts of the business at once. Transport delays, port congestion, shortages of raw materials, or unexpected production interruptions can quickly spread across the network.
The problem is not necessarily that one shipment is late. It is that the shipment may contain a component that cannot easily be replaced.
Imagine a European manufacturer assembling industrial equipment, most of the components are delivered on time, but one specialized part comes from a supplier several thousand kilometers away, if that supplier has a production problem, the European assembly line may have to be slowed down or stopped. The cost is no more limited to the component itself, it could mean overtime, missed deadlines, idle machinery and unhappy customers.
Nearshoring does not eliminate these risks. However, bringing selected suppliers closer can reduce the distance between the problem and the teams responsible for solving it.
Rising logistics complexity and geopolitical uncertainty
Distance creates more than transport costs. It also creates additional coordination.
Different time zones, regulatory requirements, customs procedures, communication practices, and transport routes can make a manufacturing supply chain harder to manage. When everything works, these challenges may remain invisible. When something goes wrong, they become very visible indeed.
Geopolitical uncertainty adds another layer. Trade restrictions, changing tariffs, regional tensions, and shifts in international relations can influence where companies choose to source and manufacture.
European manufacturers are therefore reconsidering the balance between global reach and regional control.
Rather than abandoning international sourcing altogether, many are looking more carefully at which components and processes should remain close to their core markets.
Resilience is becoming a strategic priority
There is an important distinction between efficiency and resilience.
- Efficiency asks: how can we produce at the lowest cost with the fewest resources?
- Resilience asks: how can we continue producing when conditions are no longer predictable?
A resilient manufacturing supply chain needs alternatives, visibility, and the ability to adapt. That may mean multiple suppliers, regional production capacity, better inventory planning, or stronger relationships with critical partners.
Nearshoring can contribute to this strategy by reducing dependence on long, difficult-to-coordinate supply routes. But proximity alone is not enough.
A nearby supplier with limited capacity or weak quality controls may create as many problems as a distant one.
The goal is not simply to shorten the map. It is to build a supply chain that can respond when the map changes.
The main opportunities of nearshoring
Nearshoring is more than a transport decision. Done well, it can bring production, engineering, and supply-chain management closer together creating advantages that go beyond logistics.
Shorter, more resilient supply chains
One of the most obvious opportunities is a shorter physical distance between suppliers, factories, and customers.
Manufacturers closer to the end market may benefit from shorter transport routes and more predictable replenishment cycles. This makes it easier to adjust delivery schedules, handle rush orders and respond to unexpected changes in demand.
For example, a European equipment manufacturer that sources some parts from a local supplier may be able to restock more often than would be possible with a long-distance supply chain. It won’t automatically mean less inventory cost, but it can give you more options for managing inventory.
There is also a resilience benefit. A shorter supply chain cuts exposure to some international bottlenecks especially if the regional network has multiple transport options and backup suppliers.
Still, the word may matters here a short supply chain with a single supplier can remain vulnerable a longer supply chain with several qualified suppliers may be more resilient, the right comparison is not distance alone, but the overall structure of the network.
Greater flexibility and faster response
Manufacturing rarely follows a perfectly predictable plan.
- Customer preferences change.
- Orders are delayed or brought forward.
- Product specifications evolve.
A company might need to adjust production volumes, introduce a new component, or address a quality issue without waiting weeks for a faraway partner to respond.
Some of these adjustments may be eased by nearshore manufacturing.
The proximity of suppliers to the same region can allow for faster communication and direct coordination. It could be easier for engineering and procurement teams to talk about changes, review prototypes and resolve technical questions.
This is especially relevant for manufacturers of custom equipment, industrial components or products with frequent design changes. A more responsive operating model can be enabled by smaller production batches and shorter feedback loops.
Let’s say a company is building a new industrial machine. Working with a local supplier, engineers can view a prototype in person, identify a problem and agree on a modification without the need to coordinate across multiple time zones and lengthy shipping cycles
That kind of flexibility can be valuable even when the nearshore supplier is not the cheapest option.
Closer supplier collaboration
A manufacturing relationship is not simply a transaction between a buyer and a seller. In many industries, suppliers contribute directly to product quality, engineering decisions, and production performance.
Proximity can strengthen that collaboration.
Face-to-face meetings, factory visits, joint technical reviews and faster communication can help teams better understand each other’s requirements, quality problems may be detected earlier, production teams can collaborate more directly with engineering teams, suppliers may be involved in product development at an earlier stage.
This is especially true for components that are technically complex or critical to the final product.
For a European manufacturer, a nearshore supplier can be more than a source of parts. It can become a regional partner for process optimization, continuous improvement and product innovation.
Of course, strong collaboration still depends on trust, technical competence, and clear processes. Being geographically close does not automatically create a good partnership. But it can make the partnership easier to build and maintain.
Where are the nearshoring opportunities?
Europe’s nearshoring landscape is diverse. The best location is not necessarily the one with the lowest labor cost, but the one that combines industrial capability, infrastructure, skills, logistics, and operational stability.
Central and eastern Europe
Central and Eastern Europe have long been important centers of manufacturing, with established industrial ecosystems in a number of countries.
These markets can provide access to EU supply networks, experienced industrial suppliers and established production capabilities for European manufacturers. Automotive, machinery, electronics and other industrial sectors have built strong regional linkages.
The opportunity is especially relevant for companies looking to achieve a closer integration of European assembly plants and customers.
Western balkans
The Western Balkans also attract attention from companies looking to develop regional production networks.
Geographic proximity to European markets, industrial development, and growing integration with European manufacturing ecosystems can create opportunities for selected activities.
The business case will vary considerably by country and industry. Manufacturers should assess supplier maturity, transport connections, workforce availability, regulatory conditions, and long- term stability rather than assuming that proximity guarantees a competitive advantage.
For the right product or process, the region may offer a useful balance between access to European markets and manufacturing capability.
North Africa
North Africa is another important part of the European nearshoring discussion, particularly for companies serving Southern Europe.
Its geographic position offers relatively short transport links across the Mediterranean, while selected manufacturing sectors have developed industrial expertise and export capabilities.
For European manufacturers, the opportunity may lie in combining regional proximity with competitive production costs and access to growing industrial ecosystems.
But again, the decision should not be reduced to wages.
A supplier in North Africa needs to demonstrate the right capabilities, infrastructure, workforce skills, logistics performance, and operational stability. Depending on the industry, certification requirements, energy availability, and the ability to integrate with European production systems may be just as important as production cost.
The strongest nearshoring opportunities are likely to emerge where these factors come together.
How industry 4.0 can strengthen the nearshoring business case
Nearshoring becomes more interesting when it is combined with digital manufacturing. Automation, connected systems, and AI can help regional factories compete on productivity and coordination not just proximity.
Automation reduces dependence on low-cost labor
One of the common objections to nearshoring is that production costs may be higher than in certain offshore locations.
That concern is legitimate, but it also raises a broader question: what if competitiveness depends less on labor cost and more on how efficiently the factory operates?
Industry 4.0 technologies can change the economics of manufacturing.
Robotics, automated handling systems, machine monitoring, and smart production equipment can improve productivity and reduce reliance on repetitive manual work. They can also support more consistent processes and help manufacturers manage production with greater precision.
For a nearshore factory, this matters because automation can offset part of the cost difference between regional and offshore production.
The objective is not to automate everything, some production activities still depend heavily on human expertise, judgment, and flexibility. Instead, manufacturers can identify where automation creates the greatest operational value.
A regional supplier with strong automation capabilities may be more competitive than a lower-cost supplier that relies on less efficient processes.
Digital supply-chain visibility improves coordination
Nearshoring does not remove the need for coordination. It makes good coordination more achievable especially when the right digital systems are in place.
ERP and MES platforms can help connect business planning with production execution. Supplier integration can improve the flow of information about orders, inventory, capacity, and delivery schedules.
When these systems are connected, manufacturers gain a clearer view of what is happening across the network.
That visibility can help teams identify potential delays, understand production constraints, and coordinate decisions more quickly.
Imagine a European manufacturer working with several regional suppliers, if one supplier is approaching a capacity limit, the manufacturer may be able to identify the issue earlier and adjust production plans or allocate work elsewhere.
The value comes from the combination of proximity and information. A nearby supplier is useful. A nearby supplier whose capacity and production status are visible is considerably more useful.
That visibility can help teams identify potential delays, understand production constraints, and coordinate decisions mor
AI and analytics can improve planning and forecasting
Manufacturing decisions are often based on forecasts, how much demand will there be?
Which components will be needed? When should production start? Where might a bottleneck appear?
Forecasts are never perfect but better data and analytics can make them more useful.
AI-driven planning tools can be applied for demand forecasting, inventory management, production scheduling, and anomaly detection. Used with dependable operational data, these tools allow manufacturers to spot patterns and take action sooner.
This can support the business case for nearshore manufacturing in several ways.
Better forecasts can reduce excess inventory. Better planning can lead to better supplier coordination. Early detection of production issues can help stop problems from spreading throughout the network.
The key point is that digitalization can improve the competitiveness of regional production, Nearshoring and Industry 4.0 are not competing strategies they can reinforce each other.
A regional manufacturing network supported by automation, digital visibility and AI may offer a stronger combination of speed, flexibility and operational control than a traditional low-cost sourcing model.
Nearshoring is not the right choice for everything
Nearshoring can create real advantages, but it is not a universal answer. The strongest supply-chain strategy may combine local, regional, and global suppliers rather than choosing one model for every product.
Higher costs and limited capacity
The first challenge is cost.
Labor, energy, land and compliance costs may be higher in some nearshore locations than in offshore manufacturing hubs. Depending on the product, these differences can significantly affect margins.
Supplier capacity can also be an issue a regional supplier may not have the volume, equipment, or technical specialization needed for a particular manufacturing process.
Skills shortages may create another constraint a factory can be geographically close and still struggle to recruit the engineers, technicians, or operators required to meet production targets.
These are not reasons to reject nearshoring. They are reasons to evaluate it carefully.
Transition costs should not be underestimated
Moving production or changing suppliers is rarely a simple exercise.
Manufacturers may need to qualify new suppliers, redesign components, transfer tooling, validate production processes, and establish new quality controls these activities take time and money.
There may also be risks during the transition, production could be disrupted, existing supplier relationships may need to be renegotiated, new partners may require training or technical support.
A nearshoring project should therefore be evaluated over its full lifecycle rather than through the initial production price alone.
A hybrid or multi-shore strategy may be better
Why choose between local and global sourcing as if only one can work?
A more practical approach for many manufacturers is a hybrid or multi-shore strategy.
This means combining:
- Local suppliers for highly critical, customized, or time-sensitive components.
- Nearshore suppliers for products that benefit from shorter lead times and regional collaboration.
- Global suppliers for standardized products, specialized materials, or high-volume components where international sourcing remains economically attractive.
The right mix depends on the product, the risk profile, and the company’s strategic priorities.
A manufacturer, for instance, might decide to nearshore a critical mechanical component, while continuing to source a standard electronic part from around the world. One company might keep its product development close to its headquarters, use regional production for final assembly and use international suppliers for selected raw materials.
This is where supply chain diversification becomes important.
Diversification is not about adding suppliers randomly, It is about reducing excessive dependence on one location, one supplier, or one route while keeping the network manageable.
A multi-shore strategy can provide flexibility without forcing manufacturers to abandon the benefits of global sourcing.
How should manufacturers evaluate a nearshoring opportunity?
The decision to nearshore should be based on the total business case, not a simple comparison of production costs. A structured assessment can reveal where regional manufacturing creates the most value.
1.Identify the products and components that matter most
Begin with the manufacturing supply chain itself.
What parts do you think should be made? Who are your biggest risk suppliers? Which products have long lead times or delivery issues?
The sourcing approach need not be common for all the parts, if a part is standardized and there are many qualified suppliers, the nearshoring need may not be there.
2.Compare total cost, not unit price
The quote from a supplier is only part of the equation.
Manufacturers need to consider logistics, inventory, customs, quality costs, supplier management, transition costs and the financial impact of disruption.
When you include the whole cost of a long-distance supply chain, a slightly more expensive regional provider could become competitive.
3.Assess operational capability
Can the supplier deliver the needed volumes? Does it have the right equipment, certifications, technical expertise and quality systems”.
Automation maturity, digital integration, and the ability to share reliable production data should also be considered by manufacturers for Industry 4.0 projects.
4.Evaluate resilience and scalability
A great supplier today may not be the best supplier tomorrow.
Manufacturers should consider whether the partner can scale to meet demand, manage unforeseen changes and perform during disruptions.
It’s particularly useful to be able to offer alternative capacity or work with other regional suppliers.
5.Build the digital foundation
Nearshoring works best when procurement, production, and logistics teams have access to accurate information.
ERP, MES, supplier portals, analytics and connected production systems can help create that foundation.
Digital integration should not be treated as an afterthought. It can determine how effectively the regional supply chain performs.
Conclusion
For European manufacturers, nearshoring represents a shift in how production decisions are made.
The question is no longer only:
“Where can we produce at the lowest cost?”
It is increasingly:
“Where should we produce to balance cost, resilience, speed and flexibility?”
Nearshoring can be part of that answer. It can help manufacturers reduce certain supply- chain risks, improve collaboration, respond faster to changing demand, and strengthen their regional industrial networks.
But the strongest results will come from a broader strategy.
Proximity needs to be supported by capable suppliers, reliable infrastructure, skilled people, and sound logistics. Automation and digitalization can improve the competitiveness of regional production, while AI and analytics can make the network easier to manage.
For some products, global sourcing will remain the right choice.
For others, nearshore manufacturing may offer a better balance between cost and control. And for many companies, the future will be a combination of local, nearshore, and global suppliers.
The real opportunity is not simply to bring manufacturing closer.
It is to build a manufacturing supply chain that is more adaptable, more connected, and better prepared for whatever comes next.
Commonly asked questions FAQ
1.What is nearshoring, and how does it differ from reshoring?
Nearshoring means moving production closer to the market where products are sold. Reshoring means bringing production back to the company’s home country.
2.Is nearshoring cheaper than manufacturing overseas?
Not always. Nearshoring may cost more, but shorter logistics routes and lower disruption risks can make it competitive.
3.Which nearshoring destinations should manufacturers consider?
Central and Eastern Europe, the Western Balkans, and North Africa are potential options. The right choice depends on costs, skills, infrastructure, and supplier capabilities.
4.How can Industry 4.0 make nearshoring more competitive?
Automation, digital systems, and AI can improve productivity, reduce costs, and help regional factories respond faster to changes.
These topics might interest you
Agile digitalization: modernizing industrial operations without starting from scratch
Workflow Automation: What It Is & How to Start [Guide]
How compliance management software reduces risk
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest digital insights, tips, and news.